What's the Deal with all the Injuries in the NBA Basketball Playoffs?
Discussing Sonia Sotomayor's retirement is not sexist-- it's strategic, says Arwa Mahdawi in The Guardian
Okay, not necessarily sexist, but as strategy it is kind of doomy (it only matters if the Dems lose) and an irrelevant side issue, no? Why would 7-2 be much worse than 6-3? They're still winning every politically partisan decision either way. Yeah, hopefully Sotomayor is cognizant of what happened with RBG-- how could she possibly not be?!-- and is trying to be responsible about it.
Anyway, I like Arwa Mahdawi's column The Week in Patriarchy in The Guardian; smart, funny, likes to dish dirt, and is a hard-nosed commonsensical liberal left feminist, as far as I can tell. I try to read her column regularly.
My alternative question: How is Thomas not being recused with Ginni's involvement in Jan 6 and MAGA's attempts to overthrow the government?
SCOTUS is already gone, lost, being more lost is no welcome prospect, but reforming the Court and overturning Dobbs and reinstating basic women's rights with winning Democratic majorities is far more urgent than worrying about Sotomayor's retirement plans.
The Bothsides Argument Will Kill Us All By Rick Wilson
No, not every American — in fact, not even a majority — is locked in the day to day of political struggle. Yes, there are silos. Yes, the algorithmic hypnosis of social media is real.
I cede all those points. America is a nation filled with hundreds of millions of people who aren’t partisan jihadis, left or right. There really is a desire for basic decency, decoupled from political rage, induced or not.
They’re [Axios story is] not wrong to make these points, and the America they describe is one we should crave—not being involved in politics every moment of the day is a luxury only present in stable democracies.
But they ignore the existential issue underpinning this all.
We aren’t in a nation where the sensible center will survive if Donald Trump wins.
Only one side of the political argument wants their president to govern like a dictator. Only one side believes that the President is above the law — if his name is Donald Trump. Only one side of the political equation mounted an armed attack on the United States Capitol.
Only one side has welcomed the “no enemies to our right” philosophy, which means their party winks and nods at the alt-reich, the white nationalists, and the rest of the Daily Stormer crowd. Only one side is banning books, diving deeply into the seas of culture war cruelty and persecution.
Only one side backs America’s enemies abroad and promises to hand Europe over to Vladimir Putin on a plate. I could recite the Bill of Condemnation all day, but you understand the point.
The political movement that embraces the aforementioned horrors is MAGA, and its sole leader is Donald Trump.
Supreme Court Hearing on Grump's Criminal Immunity
Anyway, whenever the news is so upside-down stupid and wrong that I'm reduced to ranting and sputtering like this, too often in the OFCB era, I turn to Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo for perspective. He's talked me off the is-this-fascist-America-takeover-thing-really-happening ledge, so to speak, many times:
"Papa Was A Rollin' Stone," Temptations (1972)
A prototype of the extended play disco mix several years before club DJs prodded the industry into actually producing 12" dance singles. "Papa" doesn't have the love train locomotive drive of the O'Jays proto-disco stereotype but works a slower, simmering, bubbling gumbo funk groove, exquisite in all its musical parts the way Detroit still turned it out in those days. It models the disco song as an epic dramatic journey; churchy handclap breakdowns, doowop vocal group blues choruses, "Papa Was a Rollin' Stone/wherever he hanged his hat was his home," and inadvertently works as a early gay dance club anthem. Early disco DJs wanted longer songs for the dancefloor and Motown and Philly International delivered them. I remember an old rocker friend, a musician, once complaining to me about the monotonous repetition of dance music. I knew what he meant, I mean, I know monotonous examples of dance music, but when dance music works, moves you, the repetition is in fact the essential appeal or hook. It feels like the funky groove line could go on forever and you want that, you never want it to stop. The repetition in the groove is precisely what many people crave most in dance music. TGIDF.
The seven minute single:
Here's the 11 minute album version:
Remix set to visuals from a film called Wattstax (1972):
Reading Music: Julius Eastman
I listen to a lot of music reading. Used to be I listened to more or less anything. This was maybe because I was simply younger and could multitask better than I can now, or at least thought I could. Or maybe I used to spend more of my reading time with newspapers and magazines (or doomscrolling the internet) instead of reading books. At any rate, while reading books now I find words, or English words, too distracting, so my reading music tastes have developed some. No words or non-English or indecipherable vocals are a prerequisite condition of my musical selections for reading now; long, slow developing musical pieces are a preference. Brian Eno's rule that ambient music should be as easy to ignore as it is interesting usually fits my needs. Although my favored reading music can be calming it doesn't have to be. I actually find some intense minimalism, like Julius Eastman, and some free jazz, for another example, as mentally invigorating as coffee. Eastman was a bad boy (see song titles) of the art music scene of the 1970s and 1980s, African American, palled around with Arthur Russell of downtown NYC experimental-disco reputation, and reportedly lived in terrible impoverished circumstances at the end of his life. I've discovered at least three posthumous albums dedicated to his music that I adore as reading music right now: Femenine; Volume 2: Joy Boy; and this one, Three Extended Pieces for Four Pianos:
The Really-Existing Mixed Economy and the Cold War Either/Or Binary
Why Urbanism Failed? Spoiler: Capitalism Killed It. Charles Mudede, The Stranger April 24, 2024
Good stuff on Keynes but why I still resist the capitalism vs socialism binary: it reflexively registers with everyone (Americans, at any rate) as an either/or proposition: private property or no private property. And so as a critique of capitalism it's stuck in a Cold War either/or muddle and ends up bolstering capitalist dogma.
People like private property rights and generally want more private property; they almost universally do not want less private property (even the people with way too much of it, I gather). Talk supporting the abolition of private property turns people off.
Yes, we need less unfettered free market capitalist governance and more democratic socialist governance but this refers to the reality that the economy and governance are in fact inseparable, we live in a mixed economy, and we live in that mixed economy with a corrosive political fiction that elevates the economy over everything else in society.
In short, we need a sustainable Green New Deal hybrid of democratic socialism and capitalism. Either/or conceptions of capitalism vs socialism are a zombie Cold War fantasy and get in the way of a really-existing progressive hybrid world where urbanism can be revived and thrive.
But fat chance of any great compromise in the progress of liberal enlightenment coming together anytime soon, perhaps, but my gut still says much closer to reality (or even desirable) than the total eradication of capitalism and/or private property. There, I said it; stodgy Neo-Keynesian liberalism, perhaps, but more practical and less abstract than, frankly, dated binary capitalism vs socialism formulations.
Anyway, beyond my pet peeve about the lingering intellectual muddle of the Cold War, and fear that I'm likely not radical revolutionary enough for Mr. Mudede or The Stranger, I'm most definitely on their side in this struggle, and agree with everything in this story:
Seattle Revives the Bullshit Economics of Low Wages
Should we survive corporate rule's effort to cook the planet so as to preserve their exorbitant profit-seeking rates of return, in the ensuing changes, adapting reforms, any corporation, publicly traded or large scale business (or government office, for that matter), paying less than a living wage will appear to us as an astonishing aberration, obviously exploitation of labor, and even criminal expropriation. And failure of a rich business to pay its fair share in taxes for the public infrastructure that supports social prosperity will appear obviously predatory; and their claims that they cannot afford living wages or cleaning up the environment an intolerable gaslighting absurdity.
And only then will it become apparent to everyone that business success does not require such kleptocratic, hoarding, and monopolizing extremes as we indulge and glorify today. In fact, free markets may create Billionaires but they are always lowballing labor and squeezing small businesses, evading taxes, and evading responsibility for their contributions to global warming and destruction of the environment.
I believe raising wages, rent controls, and price controls, strategically applied, are expansionary. And tax cuts for the rich, tax evasion, and obstructing technological innovations in sustainable energy production are in the long-run deflationary and, worst of all, pushing the world towards more catastrophe.
However We Define Fascism Remember Its Essence is Violence
By Ruth Ben-Ghiat
Trump has long kept the Fascist flame burning in America. He started his 2016 campaign by retweeting a racist meme from the Nazi outlet The Daily Stormer (the publication of neo-Nazi Andrew Anglin).
Trump brought Mussolini admirer and far-right operative Steve Bannon into the White House to launch his own “revolution of reaction.” In 2017 his administration gave Holocaust deniers a big gift: a Holocaust Remembrance Day statement that made no mention of Jews.
The GOP politicians who now feign outrage at Trump's association with Nazis such as Nick Fuentes had no problem with his mainstreaming of extremism, perhaps because some of them are extremists themselves (Paul Gosar and Marjorie Taylor Greene have appeared with Fuentes).
It’s time to accept that the GOP, which was complicit with Trump's Jan. 6 attempted authoritarian takeover, has become a party that furthers Fascist values and practices. That means the hate crimes that have skyrocketed in America since 2016 will likely continue to expand.
However we define Fascism, remembering that its essence is violence is more important than ever.
More on the history of Trump and MAGA's fascist violence from Heather Cox Richardson: HCR on MAGA Violence.
"Flame Thrower Love," Dead Boys (1978): Punk Rock Tuesday
Between 1976 and 1982, or thereabouts, there was NYC punk rock, British punk rock, LA punk rock, and then, really, okay to great punk rock scenes in every other provincial city in North America, no doubt England, France, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Japan, and eventually nearly everywhere, apparently. But in the US, anyway, Cleveland was the capitol of the provincial city 1970s punk rock scenes: The Styrenes, Electric Eels, Rocket from the Tombs, Pere Ubu, The Pagans, and the Dead Boys.
"Train Through Time," Popol Vuh (1970)
Longform electronic psychedelia evocative of Kraftwerk's "Autobahn" and Brian Eno and David Byrne's My Life in the Bush of Ghosts, both made years later. Hard to get a fix on Popol Vuh or Florian Fricke, the German composer behind them. Their first album, this one, is prophetic electronic music, incorporating a Moog synthesizer and world music polyrhythms. The rest of PV's albums, or the ones I've heard, anyway, are piano or guitar based. Fricke was pals with filmmaker Werner Herzog. I want to call Popol Vuh a great soundtrack band but, really, only five of the over twenty albums they've put out are identified as soundtracks. What I've heard, though, is always cinematic, unfurling bucolic ambient settings, often dark, somber, spooky, radiating an earthy beauty, religious piety, peasant fertility rites, dark premonitions, etc.
The Rich Conspiracy Against the Poor, exhibit evidence kajillion:
"SpaceX’s lawsuit could serve as a potent wrecking ball in the right’s push to weaken and perhaps demolish the administrative state – the network of federal agencies that the US Congress created to, among other things, promote workers’ safety on the job, prevent fraud in financial markets, protect workers’ right to unionize, limit environmental hazards, make sure consumer products are safe and administer social security for seniors."
Again, "administrative state" = Deep State = Rule of Law = Democracy = The only things between us and these grotesquely greedy corporate fascist plutocrats running everything.
Trader Joe's, Starbucks, and Elon Musk, The Guardian
And now,
Meet the Big Donors supporting Trump, Popular Information:
And I kid you not, group profile: Slavers, rich guys who abuse women, predatory landlords, massive tax evaders, loudmouth bigots, anti-liberal libertarian cranks, and anti-tax and regulations, of course, Techno-Optimist, corporate monopolists.
IOW, all the best people, as we've come to expect. And another reason to root against the Cubs and Jets.
"Bohannon's Beat," Bohannon (1975)
Hamilton Bohannon was first the band leader for Motown's top touring acts in their late '60s heyday; Marvin Gaye, Stevie Wonder, the Supremes, Temptations, Four Tops, etc. But when Motown moved to LA Bohannon stayed behind to become the Bo Diddley of the classic Disco Era. His thick propulsive funk a staple of the underground discos. TGIDF!
Women Can Vote for Women's Rights
So, in 1864, a legislature of 27 white men created a body of laws that discriminated against Black people and people of color and considered girls as young as ten able to consent to sex, and they adopted a body of criminal laws written by one single man.
And in 2024, one of those laws is back in force in Arizona.
Now, though, women can vote.
"When It's Over," Wipers (1981): Punk Rock Tuesday
My first exposure to live punk rock. Not NYC punk. Not Brit punk. Not LA punk although maybe some west coast family resemblance. The Wipers of Portland, Or, 1980-ish. The lead singer, Greg Sage, had a post-apocalyptic look; like a punk rocker in a Road Warrior movie. His lyrics were blunt declamatory identity crisis; "I Don't Know What I am," "Potential Suicide," "Pushing The Extreme," like that. The drum and bass kick up a spirited class of '77 punk rock force-beat but Sage's driven guitar distortion and effects always steal the show. Link Wray as Alien Boy.
Middle East on Edge
Israel and Palestine have been stuck in a violent stalemate, with lopsided results favoring Israel for going on 3/4 of a century now. Here's an interesting discussion giving context to the Iran's massive assault over the weekend. It was provoked by Israel's recent hit against an Iranian general in Syria but the scale of Iran's barrage of bombs shot at Israel was unprecedented.
Only two things seem relatively clear to me about Israel vs Palestine: Israel cannot be trusted to honor a two-state solution and the Palestinians cannot be trusted to build a state that won't make its primary directive the military destruction of Israel. Israel has fought to forestall a two-state solution for decades, and the Palestinians fight to save their claims to statehood from Israel's efforts to erase them.
It would seem inescapable at this point that if any two-state solution is salvageable it would now necessarily involve some large, independent, international peace-keeping force. This is something I'm guessing Israel would not welcome but a wider war in the Middle East, with Iran, would almost certainly guarantee. On the other hand, Netanyahu and Israel have been goading the US into a wider war with Iran for years.
Anyway, this has a Cuban Missile Crisis kind of geo-political tension about it. There will be a lot of pressure on Biden to handle it, while still not clear how much influence over Netanyahu or Israel he has. This has been an area of strength for him, though, so far. (BTW, Trump would escalate the crisis, don't be ridiculous.)
Back to central paradox of the situation: Israel has a right to exist and defend itself but its ongoing dehumanizing treatment of Palestinians also guarantees it will continue to be attacked by Palestinians and those sympathetic over the rotten deal they get from Israel.
Curiously, a lot of observers I know seem to think getting rid of Netanyahu could deescalate the violence-- and it certainly seems worth a try, Netanyahu is a smooth-talking thug and crook-- but the Israeli in this discussion thinks Benny Gantz (who looks like Netanyahu's little brother, no?) would make little difference in quelling the violence against Palestinians or Iran.
Anyway, it's a mess and here's hoping the violence in Gaza and the West Bank stops and cooler heads, on all sides, prevail. Seems pretty clear Iran and US don't want a wider war. Not yet sure about Netanyahu and Israel.
"Make That Move," Shalamar (1980)
Shalamar on the Soul Train Line Dance. Thank God It's Disco Friday!
Bob Dylan's Philosophy of Modern Song (2022)
I recently read Dylan's Philosophy of Modern Song; his always entertaining commentary on 66 songs in a handsome coffee table picture book. Very Americana. His list leans heavy on crooners and various Outlaw country music I'm lukewarm about at best. But he always comes at everything with his own angle. Reminds me quite a bit of his Theme Time Radio Hour shows but he's digging a little deeper. It's good rock criticism, I'd say. But also must concede it wears its male privilege out there in a way not likely to win over any women demanding equal billing in gender relations. Johnny Taylor's "Cheaper to Keep Her" and Dylan's goofy polemic for polygamy solicits a groan, he knows this, and dives right in anyway. Only four out of 66 songs include a woman. I know it can be hard to achieve anything like gender parity in most pop musical genres but, yikes, not 4 out of 66 hard! I'd also heard more of the list than I expected; better than what I often do with his radio shows, by comparison. (BTW, short consumer pitch: produce audio versions of music books with hyperlinks to streaming versions of all the music mentioned in the text.) Anyway, Dylan is sharp and funny and often more interesting than his song selections. (Another tell of good rock criticism in my book.) As for his philosophy of modern song there is more of that in his poetic interludes, riffing off what the songs say to him, often reducing songs to a string of clever that's-the-way-the-cookie-crumbles cliches, than anywhere else in the book. Nothing as didactic as a philosophy, of course. Everything with Dylan is an anecdote, a story, a scene, the way things feel. His philosophy is in the way Dylan gets into these old songs, understands them, takes them personally (in many legendary instances, this could model how he turns them into his own songs). It's a neat trick. And he's very good at it; a kind of walking and talking American songbook jukebox. At any rate, been listening to his Philosophy of Modern Song playlist on youtube. Triple shot of Dylan's Modern Song:
"Ruby (Are You Mad At Your Man)," The Osborne Brothers (1956)
"Volare," Domenico Modugno (1958): I was familiar with the 1970s car commercial version for the Plymouth Volare but experienced even in that instance the strange earworm power of this song; occasionally, even decades later, finding myself breaking into a "Volare" chorus in the odd moment. Kindred to me with "Somewhere Over the Rainbow," in this respect. Well, turns out "Volare" isn't just a nice car commercial jingle but translates from Italian to "To fly" and it's charted four times going back at least to this 1958 performance on the Ed Sullivan show; Dean Martin had a hit version, it was near ubiquitous with Italian crooners, apparently. The Modugno original spent five weeks on top the Billboard Hot 100. Dylan claims it could be the first psychedelic song or something like that; "flying," tripping, etc. I don't know about that but the original is quite a performance; it's got that soft, urgent build up til the guy is belting out "Vo-LAR-aye" with everything he's got. The song is a ballad in the chanson song style, says Wikipedia. Maybe also an example of the mysterious and elusive Italian Bel canto style of singing that can simultaneously swell with serious emotion and hilariously overwrought sentiment. Anyway, one of the most uncannily effective and mysterious earworms I've ever encountered and I've banked a few.
"Volare! Oh! Oh! Oh! Oh!"
We can't afford to be climate doomers, by Rebecca Solnit, The Guardian
If the scientists say we can overcome climate change then why are so many people doomy about it, asks the always very smart and hopeful-without-being-sappy Rebecca Solnit?
(BTW, her book, A Paradise Built In Hell, is an excellent history and another, Wanderlust, a sort of literary history of walking, one of my favorite books ever.)
Anyway, my hot take on why so many people might trend doomy on climate change:
B/c, for one big reason, the forces against climate change reform are the richest and most powerful corporate interests in the world. Big Oil and Wall Street. And everyone or nearly everyone depends on their economy; for jobs, housing, food, savings, etc.
Big Oil and the Billionaires, the people who run the economy, tell us environmental reforms threaten economic growth and security. And what threatens the Captains of Industry threatens Us, we naturally fear.
We don't want to cook the planet but we need jobs. Ack!
Now I don't believe this Chamber of Commerce bs for a minute but I certainly recognize the fear in the question: is whatever X factor good or bad for the economy? It matters. Many live with a fear that they're a few paychecks away from homeless destitution or other untold hardships. What if big biz people take their toys (jobs!) and go home, go full-hoarder austerity and wait out the "mob anarchy" (people asking for living wages, basically) in their island fortress redoubts? Too Big To Fail, etc.
It's scary.
But my contention is that the historical evidence is mounting that strategic government regulation of the economy, higher taxes on wealth, more spending on community infrastructure, and Democratic administrations since Roosevelt are more pro-economic growth, pro-jobs, and pro-prosperity than the monopolizing free market corporate rule of the Repuglicans, and this is on top of the fact the latter are also horrible bigots and the last people on earth that ought to be telling anyone else how to live their lives.
My point: With the Dems there is hope, even if it is being strained, in adapting to climate change while minimizing the humanitarian catastrophes coming and, really, already here. But there is no such hope-- all climate doomers or climate deniers, same diff-- w/ Trump and the MAGA Repugs. The problem isn't climate doomers so much as a climate dooming political party.
Vote Blue No Matter Who! Please and thank you.
What if Price Controls are Pro-Growth and Raising Interest Rates Anti-Growth? Zachary Carter on Isabella Weber
In a recent paper, Weber writes that the chip shortage [from the pandemic] established a “temporary monopoly” that allowed automakers to “raise prices without having to fear a loss in market share.” And it wasn’t just chips. Analyzing transcripts of company earnings calls, Weber concludes that firms in a variety of industries knew they could get away with gouging customers, who were already primed by the chaos of the pandemic to expect price hikes. Crucially, firms weren’t worried about losing customers to competitors; because of the supply bottlenecks, competitors would also be raising prices.
Weber calls this dynamic “sellers’ inflation,” in contrast with the traditional model of inflation, in which an excess of consumer purchasing power is to blame.
[Using WW2 as a model:]
The traditional inflation-control tactic—jacking up interest rates—would have reduced employment and industrial activity, making it harder for the military to obtain the supplies that it needed to fight. Industry-specific price controls contained consumer costs while encouraging companies to boost profits through higher sales volume. The initiative worked. During the First World War, inflation had run rampant. During much of the Second, it was close to two per cent. And yet factories were operating at peak levels.
If contemporary policymakers could do the same thing, Weber argued, they could limit inflation without inducing layoffs and wage cuts.
The Battle Over Techno's Origins-- Detroit or Berlin?
"The anemic funding of the arts in America means that the institutions memorializing the country’s cultural exports look like scale models.
"Spice," EON: From some TV dance show in Detroit in 1992.
"Blue Yodel No. 9 (Standing on the Corner)," Jimmie Rodgers with Louis and Lil Armstrong (1930)
The riddle of racist intimacy in the Old South--
"You are not up here in this bed with me, where through no fault nor willing of your own you should be, and you are not down here on this pallet floor with me, where through no fault nor willing of your own you must and will be, not through any fault or willing of our own who would not what we cannot."
-- William Faulkner, Absalom, Absalom! (1936)
The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality, by Katharina Pistor (2019)
Katharina Pistor is a Columbia Law professor. The Code of Capital is a historical review of how wealth is coded into law, going back to the 12th and 13th centuries and even Roman law, but focuses with more detail and specificity on the rise of the modern state and industrial capitalism in the 19th and 20th centuries.
One of the biggest claims in Piketty's book is an assertion that, based on a review of the economic data for the last 250 years, r > g; or the rate of return on capital assets, r (rents, interest, etc), are greater than general economic growth, g (GDP, wages, etc). In other words, wealth grows faster than the general economy; or the rich-get-richer-the-poor-get-poorer, structurally, built into the free market system, forever. For one, the evidence devastatingly refutes classical economist Simon Kuznet's empirical work in the 1950s showing a narrowing of inequality over time.
And, anyway, a r > g rigging of the economy has been evident forever, or for as long as workers have been paid less than the marginal product of their labor, less than living wages, but give it to Piketty for pulling together all the receipts. Establishing the veracity of r > g is of no small consequence, of course, and overcoming resistance to its implications no small task. What Pistor's book shows is how r > g has in fact been coded into law with very little push back for a century and a half if not more. Beginning in the U.S. not long, notably, after laissez-faire capitalist rule takes over the British Empire and just about the same time industrial Robber Barons are taking over in the U.S.
Capital is an asset, a designation of value attached to land, trade goods, buildings, technologies, intellectual property rights, etc. Coding capital into law involves defining an asset, establishing precedent for its legal protection in older property rights law, and thereby securing that its private property value will be backed up by the coercive force of the State. To an extent coding capital into law has probably always been about fortifying class inequality; protecting the richies from the uppity peasants. But, more narrowly, as in examples like English Land Trusts, or Limited Liability Contracts (LLCs), from the first charter companies to later modern corporations, coding capital into law was in the beginning an instrument of the state to reduce risk and encourage private investment and stimulate commercial activity. They began as instruments of state expansion and private investment. Joint-stock companies, charter companies, explode in number around the world in the wake of Columbus; beginning in the 16th century. It's not like the relationships between states and these private companies were ever entirely peaceful, without conflict and corruption, but somewhere along the way, by Pistor's account, with the rise of the modern corporation in the late 19th century, the corporate lawyers take over and coding capital into law turns into a racket essentially preserving and maximizing r > g profit returns for corporate wealth interests.
Even more alarming, Pistor says since the late 19th century the coding of capital into law has fallen almost entirely into private hands; those of corporate lawyers, who write up asset laws that suit their corporate clients and overlords. These laws then are rubber stamped by the legal system, never seriously scrutinized for the economic justice or injustice of their terms, and barely even reviewed until they blow-up in some general crisis, say, the collapse of the Savings & Loan Industry, and are rarely investigated even then. In other words, it is a Casino Capitalist world and the House always wins because corporate lawyers and quants write the rules.
As remedy Pistor urges incrementalism, rolling back the rigged codes one by one, not a particularly cheering prospect, another Sisyphean task on our mounting collective pile, but one you presume she makes because anything more sweeping or radical risks collapse of our whole economic House of Cards; smashing the relatively poor first as economic downturns always do.
So more evidence Too-Big-To-Fail is actually a thing. And another stunning take on modernity turning over the keys to civilization to Captains of Industry now hellbent on cooking the planet to protect their grotesque wealth. The Code of Capital adds to the resistance.
The Dean's List of Pop Albums for 2023
This is his annual list of favorites from the last year; 84 albums he awarded with an 'A' grade. (Yes, the pedantic teacherly thing has always been a big draw for me. He's not called The Dean for nothing.) The records on his list I've actually heard at least once and wasn't repulsed by: Olivia Rodrigo, Boygenius, Robert Forster, Gina Burch, Wednesday, The Moldy Peaches, and Big Joanie.
That's seven out of 84! I'm pathetically out of it, I know, but you don't have to be!
And, come on, you haven't caught up yet with 2022 either:
At any rate, Xgau is ancient (even more ancient than me) and I think lives off his Substack gig now, And It Don't Stop, and deserves your support.
"Archangels Thunderbird," Amon Duul II (1970)
Classic riff rock from Germany, 1970; lady singer, Renate Knaup, caterwauling dark gothic prophecies. Amon Duul ii emerged out of a post-'68 Berlin art commune, and are often initially confused (or by non-Germans, anyway) with Amon Duul, a competing splinter group from the original commune (who actually didn't start recording until after Amon Duul ii had already recorded several albums) and by most accounts are mediocre at best. At any rate, Amon Duul ii's album Yeti is stone-cold classic Krautrock. Histrionic pirates on sonic prog adventures into riffology, pastoral landscapes, and free rock music racket. And, likewise, their first album, Phallus Dei (1969), is an experimental rock juggernaut.
(Original Amon Duul ii's bassist, Dave Anderson, joined Hawkwind for 1971's In Search of Space.)
Os Mutantes "Panis et circensus" (1969)
The Conservative Crusade to Burn, Baby, Burn
Bankrolled by mysterious donors, a little-known group named Consumers’ Research has emerged as a key player in the conservative crusade to prevent Wall Street from factoring climate change into its investment decisions.
NATO's 75th Anniversary
Yesterday, April 4, was the 75th year anniversary of NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization); the collective commitment to peace of 12 countries in Western Europe and the United States in the wake of WW2. Today NATO includes 32 countries banding together against the military aggression of other nations. HCR provides some history of NATO built around President Truman's comments in support of the treaty when he signed it in 1949:
“There are different kinds of governmental and economic systems, just as there are different languages and different cultures. But these differences present no real obstacle to the voluntary association of free nations devoted to the common cause of peace,” he said. “[I]t is possible for nations to achieve unity on the great principles of human freedom and justice, and at the same time to permit, in other respects, the greatest diversity of which the human mind is capable.”
The experience of the United States “in creating one nation out of…the peoples of many lands” proved that this idea could work, Truman said. “This method of organizing diverse peoples and cultures is in direct contrast to the method of the police state, which attempts to achieve unity by imposing the same beliefs and the same rule of force on everyone.”
We can debate (and do) what constitutes a "free nation" or question the lack of freedom, or inequality, and discrimination against one group or another in an otherwise "free nation," or democracy, and in the pursuit of a more perfect union we absolutely should, but to sustain such efforts for more freedom we also must be able to tell the basic difference between the forces for "free nations" and "police states."
NATO, the UN, international aid workers, and currently in US elections, Democrats, support and promote "free nations" and peaceful coexistence, while Russia, Republicans, and various "police state" dictatorships around the world (and rightwing governments like Israel's) support and promote more violent division and war. At this moment in history, it really is that simple.