Okay, not necessarily sexist, but as strategy it is kind of doomy (it only matters if the Dems lose) and an irrelevant side issue, no? Why would 7-2 be much worse than 6-3? They're still winning every politically partisan decision either way. Yeah, hopefully Sotomayor is cognizant of what happened with RBG-- how could she possibly not be?!-- and is trying to be responsible about it.
Anyway, I like Arwa Mahdawi's column The Week in Patriarchy in The Guardian; smart, funny, likes to dish dirt, and is a hard-nosed commonsensical liberal left feminist, as far as I can tell. I try to read her column regularly.
My alternative question: How is Thomas not being recused with Ginni's involvement in Jan 6 and MAGA's attempts to overthrow the government?
SCOTUS is already gone, lost, being more lost is no welcome prospect, but reforming the Court and overturning Dobbs and reinstating basic women's rights with winning Democratic majorities is far more urgent than worrying about Sotomayor's retirement plans.
No comments:
Post a Comment